The ERAI Fellowship is an 11-week executive programme for senior journalists and media professionals. It exists for one reason: to equip the people who inform the public with the knowledge, tools, and authority to report on artificial intelligence responsibly, accurately, and without fear.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a future story. It is the story. It is shaping how elections are run, how healthcare decisions are made, how labour markets are structured, and how information itself is produced and distributed. And yet the majority of journalists covering AI lack the technical grounding, governance literacy, and investigative frameworks to do so with the rigour the story demands.
See the Full Programme
Countries
Represented
Weeks -
Expert-Led
Alumni &
Applicants
Fellowship
Reviews
The institutions built to regulate artificial intelligence are working to keep pace with a technology that evolves faster than policy can be written.
When AI systems fail, bias spreads, or harm goes unnoticed, journalists are the first line of accountability. The fellowship equips fellows to understand AI ethics, safety risks, and global governance failures.
AI harm often hides inside systems that are opaque by design. The fellowship trains fellows to question the claims companies make, audit how models are built and deployed, and follow the evidence through technical complexity. Fellows learn to separate genuine risk from hype and to ground every story in verifiable fact.
The decisions that shape AI are made by a small number of companies, governments, and institutions. The fellowship prepares fellows to scrutinize those decisions, expose the gaps between promise and practice, and give the public the reporting it needs to demand better. Accountability journalism is how AI governance stays honest.
The ERAI Fellowship curriculum is built around three components that work together across all 11 weeks to move each fellow from conceptual understanding to applied practice to real-world output.
Eight expert-led sessions, 90 minutes each. Non-technical, journalism-first understanding of how AI systems work, where risks arise, and how institutions shape the deployment and regulation of these technologies.
ERAI faculty are practising experts — not theorists. They bring active experience as AI ethicists, governance architects, policy leaders, and senior journalists who work at the intersection of technology, accountability, and public interest every day.
AI is not just a beat. It is the lens through which every major story will be told for the next decade. The journalists who understand it deeply will shape how the public, policymakers, and institutions respond to it. The ERAI Fellowship gives you the foundation to be one of them.
Cohort 1 brings together senior journalists and media professionals from across the world — selected for their editorial experience, professional standing, and commitment to public-interest journalism. They are the first generation of ERAI-trained human guardrails for the AI era.
Senior Data Journalist, Germany
Tech Policy Editor, UAE
AI Investigative Reporter, Singapore
AI Ethicist & Lead Gen AI
Architect, Capgemini
Media Governance Fellow, Nigeria
Broadcast Lead, Brazil
Tech Bureau Chief, UK
Digital Policy Analyst, India
Digital Policy Analyst, India
Digital Policy Analyst, India
Hear directly from the senior media professionals inside Cohort 1 - what drew them to the fellowship, what they learned, and what they are taking back to their newsrooms.
For me it was practical. I was able to use and implement what I studied online every week. This has helped me to get more views and subscribers for my YouTube channel and website. It was a wonderful opportunity for me and timely because the fellowship came during my final days ahead of launching my website.
What I liked about the fellowship is the overall quality of conceptualization, targeted expertise, structure, shape, content, pedagogy, hands on training, pace, delivery, flexibility, academic management, collaboration and participation of the stakeholders, and targeted outcome.
The course content, instructors, quality of cohort, camaraderie and commitment as we worked on the final project. The support from the team. And potential of the network to develop into something substantial in future.